https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263359 The court upheld the Punjab Government notification dated 16th November, 2012, regarding the regularization of marriage palaces in response to public interest concerns. It found the policy to be in the public interest for regulating the growth of marriage palaces. The court determined that the policy did not violate the equality principle under Article 14 of the Constitution and that the charges were not arbitrary. The court clarified that the policy had a retroactive, not retrospective, effect on existing marriage palaces, aiming to ensure compliance with safety norms. The court dismissed the writ petitions and directed compliance with the amended policy within a specified timeframe. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:33:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263359 The court upheld the Punjab Government notification dated 16th November, 2012, regarding the regularization of marriage palaces in response to public interest concerns. It found the policy to be in the public interest for regulating the growth of marriage palaces. The court determined that the policy did not violate the equality principle under Article 14 of the Constitution and that the charges were not arbitrary. The court clarified that the policy had a retroactive, not retrospective, effect on existing marriage palaces, aiming to ensure compliance with safety norms. The court dismissed the writ petitions and directed compliance with the amended policy within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263359