https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263359 Differentiated charges for marriage palaces and hotels were upheld because the two classes were found to have real and intelligible differences in land-use impact, regulatory requirements and parking burden, satisfying Article 14. CLU, EDC and allied charges, including zonal rates, were treated as policy-based and non-arbitrary because they reflected land value, development potential and location-based distinctions, with the statutory appeal mechanism available. The policy was also not impermissibly retrospective, as it applied regulatory compliance and regularisation conditions to existing unauthorized marriage palaces within the planning framework. en-us Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:33:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263359 Differentiated charges for marriage palaces and hotels were upheld because the two classes were found to have real and intelligible differences in land-use impact, regulatory requirements and parking burden, satisfying Article 14. CLU, EDC and allied charges, including zonal rates, were treated as policy-based and non-arbitrary because they reflected land value, development potential and location-based distinctions, with the statutory appeal mechanism available. The policy was also not impermissibly retrospective, as it applied regulatory compliance and regularisation conditions to existing unauthorized marriage palaces within the planning framework. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263359