<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263353</link>
    <description>The court refrained from delving into the merits of the case and instructed the petitioner to provide relevant documents to the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Trichy. The Deputy Commissioner was directed to evaluate and address the petitioner&#039;s representation for the return of seized jewellery within four weeks, ensuring a personal hearing. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:33:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 21 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263353</link>
      <description>The court refrained from delving into the merits of the case and instructed the petitioner to provide relevant documents to the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1, Trichy. The Deputy Commissioner was directed to evaluate and address the petitioner&#039;s representation for the return of seized jewellery within four weeks, ensuring a personal hearing. The Writ Petition was disposed of with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>