<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 17 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263349</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s change in the method of valuation of closing stock was bona fide, fully disclosed, and compliant with accounting standards. Legal precedents supported that a mere unsustainable claim does not warrant a penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 17 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263349</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s change in the method of valuation of closing stock was bona fide, fully disclosed, and compliant with accounting standards. Legal precedents supported that a mere unsustainable claim does not warrant a penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263349</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>