<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172798</link>
    <description>The court upheld the appellate judgment, dismissing the appeal and affirming the acquittal of the respondent. The court found no grounds to interfere with the Sessions Judge&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of independent corroboration and the need for caution in evaluating statements recorded under S. 108 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 16:43:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 276 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172798</link>
      <description>The court upheld the appellate judgment, dismissing the appeal and affirming the acquittal of the respondent. The court found no grounds to interfere with the Sessions Judge&#039;s decision, emphasizing the importance of independent corroboration and the need for caution in evaluating statements recorded under S. 108 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>