<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 697 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172795</link>
    <description>Repeal of the enabling law ended the Lokpal&#039;s fixed tenure before expiry, but the office-holder remained subject to continuing statutory disabilities attached to the office. The legal analysis treated the loss as more than mere loss of office because the disabling consequences did not disappear on repeal, and the saving provisions were read with the statutory scheme governing those restrictions. On that basis, compensation was warranted for the unexpired part of the tenure, and relief could be moulded on the facts pleaded. The conclusion was that salary for the remaining term was payable as compensation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:06:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 697 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172795</link>
      <description>Repeal of the enabling law ended the Lokpal&#039;s fixed tenure before expiry, but the office-holder remained subject to continuing statutory disabilities attached to the office. The legal analysis treated the loss as more than mere loss of office because the disabling consequences did not disappear on repeal, and the saving provisions were read with the statutory scheme governing those restrictions. On that basis, compensation was warranted for the unexpired part of the tenure, and relief could be moulded on the facts pleaded. The conclusion was that salary for the remaining term was payable as compensation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172795</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>