https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172795 The Supreme Court held that the appellant, a former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court appointed as Lokpal under the Orissa Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, was entitled to compensation for loss of salary due to the abrupt end of his tenure as Lokpal post-repeal. The Court directed the respondents to pay the salary difference, emphasizing the need for appropriate compensation in such cases. The judgment highlighted the necessity of compensating the appellant for the disqualification from holding any office after ceasing to be Lokpal, rejecting arguments against providing compensation and modifying the High Court's decision to grant the directed compensation without costs. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Aug 2015 15:06:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172795 The Supreme Court held that the appellant, a former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court appointed as Lokpal under the Orissa Lokpal and Lokayukta Act, was entitled to compensation for loss of salary due to the abrupt end of his tenure as Lokpal post-repeal. The Court directed the respondents to pay the salary difference, emphasizing the need for appropriate compensation in such cases. The judgment highlighted the necessity of compensating the appellant for the disqualification from holding any office after ceasing to be Lokpal, rejecting arguments against providing compensation and modifying the High Court's decision to grant the directed compensation without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172795