https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172790 An order cancelling bail under Section 439(2) CrPC was upheld because the trial court had granted bail on irrelevant considerations and had ignored material facts relevant to the accused's role and the prosecution case. The Court reaffirmed that grant of bail and cancellation of bail are governed by different standards, but a bail order may still be interfered with if discretion was exercised on legally untenable grounds, on irrelevant materials, or in a perverse manner. It also reiterated that the superior court may examine whether the bail discretion was properly applied without undertaking a detailed re-appreciation of evidence. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Sep 2017 13:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172790 An order cancelling bail under Section 439(2) CrPC was upheld because the trial court had granted bail on irrelevant considerations and had ignored material facts relevant to the accused's role and the prosecution case. The Court reaffirmed that grant of bail and cancellation of bail are governed by different standards, but a bail order may still be interfered with if discretion was exercised on legally untenable grounds, on irrelevant materials, or in a perverse manner. It also reiterated that the superior court may examine whether the bail discretion was properly applied without undertaking a detailed re-appreciation of evidence. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172790