https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172789 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in an eviction case under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. The petitioner, a tenant, submitted an undertaking to vacate but later sought to challenge the High Court's order. The Supreme Court ruled that by submitting the undertaking, the petitioner waived the right to challenge the eviction order, citing the principle of election. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, affirming the High Court's decision for the petitioner to vacate the premises. en-us Fri, 23 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:58:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172789 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in an eviction case under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949. The petitioner, a tenant, submitted an undertaking to vacate but later sought to challenge the High Court's order. The Supreme Court ruled that by submitting the undertaking, the petitioner waived the right to challenge the eviction order, citing the principle of election. Consequently, the Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition, affirming the High Court's decision for the petitioner to vacate the premises. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172789