https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172787 The Court found that the point in controversy was already covered against the appellants by trade notices issued by various Collectorates. Counsel had previously been given time to obtain instructions but reported that no instructions were received. In those circumstances, the Court disposed of the appeals on the basis that the existing trade notices foreclosed the controversy and there was no material available to advance the appellants' case. The appeals were dismissed. en-us Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Aug 2015 12:19:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172787 The Court found that the point in controversy was already covered against the appellants by trade notices issued by various Collectorates. Counsel had previously been given time to obtain instructions but reported that no instructions were received. In those circumstances, the Court disposed of the appeals on the basis that the existing trade notices foreclosed the controversy and there was no material available to advance the appellants' case. The appeals were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172787