https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172783 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Superintendent of Narcotic Control Bureau challenging the bail granted to the respondent by the High Court of Madras. The Court found that the High Court judge did not adhere to the established parameters for bail applications under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, pre-judged compliance matters, and failed to record a necessary finding. Consequently, the impugned bail order was set aside, and the respondent was returned to jail. The Court emphasized the need for reasonable grounds to believe in the accused's innocence and non-repetition of offenses when granting bail under the Act. en-us Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:35:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172783 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Superintendent of Narcotic Control Bureau challenging the bail granted to the respondent by the High Court of Madras. The Court found that the High Court judge did not adhere to the established parameters for bail applications under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, pre-judged compliance matters, and failed to record a necessary finding. Consequently, the impugned bail order was set aside, and the respondent was returned to jail. The Court emphasized the need for reasonable grounds to believe in the accused's innocence and non-repetition of offenses when granting bail under the Act. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172783