<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1073 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172783</link>
    <description>Under the NDPS Act, bail cannot be granted unless the court records satisfaction that the statutory twin conditions are met, namely reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. Where the public prosecutor opposes bail, an order made without that recorded satisfaction fails the statutory mandate. Alleged non-compliance with arrest and reporting requirements under Sections 52 and 57 cannot, by itself, justify bail at the bail stage, because such matters are for evidence and final adjudication and official acts are presumed regular. The bail order was set aside and custody restored, with liberty to seek fresh relief in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 11:35:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1073 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172783</link>
      <description>Under the NDPS Act, bail cannot be granted unless the court records satisfaction that the statutory twin conditions are met, namely reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty and is not likely to commit an offence while on bail. Where the public prosecutor opposes bail, an order made without that recorded satisfaction fails the statutory mandate. Alleged non-compliance with arrest and reporting requirements under Sections 52 and 57 cannot, by itself, justify bail at the bail stage, because such matters are for evidence and final adjudication and official acts are presumed regular. The bail order was set aside and custody restored, with liberty to seek fresh relief in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>