<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 910 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172781</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the criminal proceedings against the appellants. It held that purchasing insurance stamps from outside Uttar Pradesh did not violate any laws. The Court found the FIR allegations baseless, lacking in legal merit, and indicative of harassment. The High Court&#039;s decision was set aside, emphasizing the power to quash FIRs when they do not establish any offense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 910 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172781</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashing the criminal proceedings against the appellants. It held that purchasing insurance stamps from outside Uttar Pradesh did not violate any laws. The Court found the FIR allegations baseless, lacking in legal merit, and indicative of harassment. The High Court&#039;s decision was set aside, emphasizing the power to quash FIRs when they do not establish any offense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>