https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263327 The appeal was taken up for a final decision without the pre-deposit requirement. The appellant successfully argued against the Revenue's claim of collecting service tax, presenting evidence showing no correlation between service tax and flat cost. The original authority's decision was upheld, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order due to lack of detailed analysis. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief and dismissing the Revenue's allegations of service tax collection. en-us Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Aug 2015 14:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263327 The appeal was taken up for a final decision without the pre-deposit requirement. The appellant successfully argued against the Revenue's claim of collecting service tax, presenting evidence showing no correlation between service tax and flat cost. The original authority's decision was upheld, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order due to lack of detailed analysis. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief and dismissing the Revenue's allegations of service tax collection. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263327