<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found that the appellant complied with Rule 6(2) from 1.9.2004, reversing the credit on inputs as required. The demand for 8/10% of the total price of exempted goods was deemed unsustainable, and the imposition of interest and penalties was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2016 17:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1236 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the appellant. It found that the appellant complied with Rule 6(2) from 1.9.2004, reversing the credit on inputs as required. The demand for 8/10% of the total price of exempted goods was deemed unsustainable, and the imposition of interest and penalties was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>