<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263318</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on Shri Rajesh Maheshwari for his involvement in clandestine activities, citing substantial evidence. However, the penalty imposed on Shri M.B. Baheti was set aside due to insufficient evidence linking him to the illicit actions. The appeal by Shri M.B. Baheti was allowed, while the appeal by Shri Rajesh Maheshwari was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1235 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263318</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty imposed on Shri Rajesh Maheshwari for his involvement in clandestine activities, citing substantial evidence. However, the penalty imposed on Shri M.B. Baheti was set aside due to insufficient evidence linking him to the illicit actions. The appeal by Shri M.B. Baheti was allowed, while the appeal by Shri Rajesh Maheshwari was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>