https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263309 The court upheld the conviction under Section 20 (b) (ii) (C) of the NDPS Act, finding compliance with Section 50 and 55, credibility of prosecution witnesses, and adequacy of link evidence. The sentence was reduced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000, with a default sentence of six months, considering the appellant's age and time served. The appeal was dismissed, adjusting the sentence for time already served. en-us Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:57:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263309 The court upheld the conviction under Section 20 (b) (ii) (C) of the NDPS Act, finding compliance with Section 50 and 55, credibility of prosecution witnesses, and adequacy of link evidence. The sentence was reduced to 10 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1,00,000, with a default sentence of six months, considering the appellant's age and time served. The appeal was dismissed, adjusting the sentence for time already served. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263309