<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1226 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263309</link>
    <description>Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies to personal search and not to recovery from a bag or other container carried by an accused; on that basis, the recovery was treated as valid. The testimony of police witnesses was accepted because it consistently established recovery, sealing, custody and forwarding of samples, and non-joining of an independent witness did not, by itself, discredit otherwise reliable evidence. For sentencing in the commercial quantity case, the Court considered the quantity involved, the accused&#039;s age, antecedents and custody already undergone, and reduced the punishment to the minimum prescribed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1226 - HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263309</link>
      <description>Section 50 of the NDPS Act applies to personal search and not to recovery from a bag or other container carried by an accused; on that basis, the recovery was treated as valid. The testimony of police witnesses was accepted because it consistently established recovery, sealing, custody and forwarding of samples, and non-joining of an independent witness did not, by itself, discredit otherwise reliable evidence. For sentencing in the commercial quantity case, the Court considered the quantity involved, the accused&#039;s age, antecedents and custody already undergone, and reduced the punishment to the minimum prescribed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>