<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1223 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263306</link>
    <description>The court found the seizure of goods under Section 110 of the Customs Act to be illegal and invalid as the grounds cited did not meet the requirements of Section 111. The court quashed the seizure order and directed authorities to clear the goods upon payment of assessed duty. For bills of entry with pending queries, the petitioner was given two weeks to respond before authorities made a final decision. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 09:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1223 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263306</link>
      <description>The court found the seizure of goods under Section 110 of the Customs Act to be illegal and invalid as the grounds cited did not meet the requirements of Section 111. The court quashed the seizure order and directed authorities to clear the goods upon payment of assessed duty. For bills of entry with pending queries, the petitioner was given two weeks to respond before authorities made a final decision. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>