<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1221 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263304</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, directing reconsideration of the appellant&#039;s promotion to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax based on communicated ACRs from specific years. If found suitable for promotion, the appellant would be entitled to arrears of salary and revision of retiral benefits. The authorities were instructed not to interfere with already made promotions and given the option to create a notional post if needed to implement the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 18:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1221 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263304</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, directing reconsideration of the appellant&#039;s promotion to Chief Commissioner of Income Tax based on communicated ACRs from specific years. If found suitable for promotion, the appellant would be entitled to arrears of salary and revision of retiral benefits. The authorities were instructed not to interfere with already made promotions and given the option to create a notional post if needed to implement the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>