<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1220 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263303</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and eviction order. It held that the Public Premises Act could not retrospectively apply to premises protected under the State Rent Control Acts. The Court emphasized that eviction proceedings should be initiated under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, respecting the protections granted to tenants under the State Rent Control Acts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 07:56:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1220 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263303</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and eviction order. It held that the Public Premises Act could not retrospectively apply to premises protected under the State Rent Control Acts. The Court emphasized that eviction proceedings should be initiated under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, respecting the protections granted to tenants under the State Rent Control Acts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>