<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1217 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263300</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it constituted a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. The court found that the AO had already examined the relevant issues during the original assessment, and there was no new material to justify the reassessment. Consequently, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 11:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1217 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263300</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, ruling that the reopening of the assessment under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act was invalid as it constituted a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer. The court found that the AO had already examined the relevant issues during the original assessment, and there was no new material to justify the reassessment. Consequently, the appeals filed by the revenue were dismissed, and the Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>