<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1193 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263276</link>
    <description>The bench found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the service tax liability under the category of man power recruitment and supply agency services was not applicable. The bench relied on previous judgments and precedents, including the appellant&#039;s own case and a High Court ruling in a similar case. It was held that the impugned order was unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 10:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1193 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263276</link>
      <description>The bench found in favor of the appellant, ruling that the service tax liability under the category of man power recruitment and supply agency services was not applicable. The bench relied on previous judgments and precedents, including the appellant&#039;s own case and a High Court ruling in a similar case. It was held that the impugned order was unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>