<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1192 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263275</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that service tax was not payable under the relevant category for exported iron ore and that unjust enrichment did not apply in this case. The decision emphasized that taxes paid on exported goods should be refunded, irrespective of the accounting treatment by the entity that initially paid the service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 14:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1192 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263275</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that service tax was not payable under the relevant category for exported iron ore and that unjust enrichment did not apply in this case. The decision emphasized that taxes paid on exported goods should be refunded, irrespective of the accounting treatment by the entity that initially paid the service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>