<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263274</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the demand for service tax liability and interest on the appellant for the Construction Service of Residential Complex for the period 2008-2009. The Tribunal set aside penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the appellant&#039;s location in a rural area and the genuine belief regarding service tax liability. The appellant was directed to pay the specified interest amount within the given timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1191 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263274</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT MUMBAI upheld the demand for service tax liability and interest on the appellant for the Construction Service of Residential Complex for the period 2008-2009. The Tribunal set aside penalties under Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994, considering the appellant&#039;s location in a rural area and the genuine belief regarding service tax liability. The appellant was directed to pay the specified interest amount within the given timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>