<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1182 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263265</link>
    <description>The court allowed the condonation of a four-day delay in filing an appeal and proceeded to hear the appeal, which involved a driver transporting rice bran oil without proper documentation. The court upheld the tax but set aside the penalty order imposed by the authority, emphasizing the necessity of providing reasons for penalties in quasi-judicial functions. The case was remanded for a new penalty decision based on all relevant facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 06:34:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1182 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263265</link>
      <description>The court allowed the condonation of a four-day delay in filing an appeal and proceeded to hear the appeal, which involved a driver transporting rice bran oil without proper documentation. The court upheld the tax but set aside the penalty order imposed by the authority, emphasizing the necessity of providing reasons for penalties in quasi-judicial functions. The case was remanded for a new penalty decision based on all relevant facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263265</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>