<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263261</link>
    <description>A tax appeal falling below the prescribed monetary threshold was treated as not maintainable, because the relevant monetary-limit instruction applied even to pending appeals. The Court followed its earlier view that duty and penalty below the limit bar continuation of the appeal, and the appeal was dismissed on that basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 06:33:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1178 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263261</link>
      <description>A tax appeal falling below the prescribed monetary threshold was treated as not maintainable, because the relevant monetary-limit instruction applied even to pending appeals. The Court followed its earlier view that duty and penalty below the limit bar continuation of the appeal, and the appeal was dismissed on that basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>