<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1175 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263258</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge against a recovery notice for outstanding duty, interest, and penalty, despite jurisdictional issues raised regarding the show cause notice. The Court held that the original order had been upheld up to the Supreme Court due to belated proceedings, rendering the petitioner unable to resist the demand on jurisdictional grounds. Emphasizing the distinction between an erroneous order and a nullity, the Court rejected the petitioner&#039;s arguments, citing that the petitioner cannot evade the demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 06:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1175 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263258</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s challenge against a recovery notice for outstanding duty, interest, and penalty, despite jurisdictional issues raised regarding the show cause notice. The Court held that the original order had been upheld up to the Supreme Court due to belated proceedings, rendering the petitioner unable to resist the demand on jurisdictional grounds. Emphasizing the distinction between an erroneous order and a nullity, the Court rejected the petitioner&#039;s arguments, citing that the petitioner cannot evade the demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>