<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1172 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263255</link>
    <description>The court held that the communication directing payment of Excise Duty without a show cause notice was not a demand but a preliminary step in the adjudication process. The court directed the respondent to issue a fresh notice under the Central Excise Act, allowing the petitioner to respond before any orders were passed. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the importance of following proper procedures and providing opportunities for parties to respond in matters concerning Excise Duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 06:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1172 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263255</link>
      <description>The court held that the communication directing payment of Excise Duty without a show cause notice was not a demand but a preliminary step in the adjudication process. The court directed the respondent to issue a fresh notice under the Central Excise Act, allowing the petitioner to respond before any orders were passed. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, emphasizing the importance of following proper procedures and providing opportunities for parties to respond in matters concerning Excise Duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>