<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 2 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming the Service Tax demand, interest, and penalties against the appellants for willful suppression of facts and failure to pay the full tax amount on time. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments regarding reimbursible expenses and upheld penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 2 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s order confirming the Service Tax demand, interest, and penalties against the appellants for willful suppression of facts and failure to pay the full tax amount on time. The Tribunal rejected the appellants&#039; arguments regarding reimbursible expenses and upheld penalties under Sections 76, 77, and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was dismissed for lack of merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=57</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>