<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the long term and short term capital gains were not to be treated as business income but should be taxed under the head of capital gains. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this treatment was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing factors such as holding periods, absence of borrowings, and profit distribution in support of their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1149 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the long term and short term capital gains were not to be treated as business income but should be taxed under the head of capital gains. The appeal by the Revenue challenging this treatment was dismissed, with the Tribunal emphasizing factors such as holding periods, absence of borrowings, and profit distribution in support of their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>