<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1140 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263223</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of the addition on account of investment from undisclosed sources was supported by the comprehensive analysis and alignment with legal principles and precedents. The tribunal found that the evidence and legal precedents presented favored the assessee, ultimately leading to the decision in their favor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2015 05:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1140 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263223</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The deletion of the addition on account of investment from undisclosed sources was supported by the comprehensive analysis and alignment with legal principles and precedents. The tribunal found that the evidence and legal precedents presented favored the assessee, ultimately leading to the decision in their favor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>