https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263222 The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court found the sanction order for prosecution valid and proved the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification. The appellant's abuse of position for pecuniary advantage was confirmed, leading to a reduced sentence of one year for that offense. The court addressed the issue of the appellant's counsel absence during High Court proceedings, concluding it did not prejudice the appellant. The appeal was disposed of with modified sentencing and upheld convictions. en-us Sun, 01 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 09 Aug 2016 12:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263222 The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court found the sanction order for prosecution valid and proved the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification. The appellant's abuse of position for pecuniary advantage was confirmed, leading to a reduced sentence of one year for that offense. The court addressed the issue of the appellant's counsel absence during High Court proceedings, concluding it did not prejudice the appellant. The appeal was disposed of with modified sentencing and upheld convictions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sun, 01 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263222