<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1020 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172775</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit condition and remanding the matter for a decision on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals). The confusion arising from conflicting tribunal decisions regarding the method of valuation of physician samples and the limitation period for show cause notices was acknowledged, leading to a fair consideration of the circumstances presented by the appellant. The judgment settled the issues in favor of the appellant, emphasizing compliance with the stay order and the need for a thorough analysis of the legal principles involved in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1020 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172775</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, waiving the pre-deposit condition and remanding the matter for a decision on merits by the Commissioner (Appeals). The confusion arising from conflicting tribunal decisions regarding the method of valuation of physician samples and the limitation period for show cause notices was acknowledged, leading to a fair consideration of the circumstances presented by the appellant. The judgment settled the issues in favor of the appellant, emphasizing compliance with the stay order and the need for a thorough analysis of the legal principles involved in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>