<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (12) TMI 276 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172773</link>
    <description>A minority educational institution retains protection under Article 30(1) where its origin, management, religious character and institutional identity show it was established and administered by a religious minority, even if affiliated to a university. That protection includes substantial autonomy in admissions and administration, so a marks-only admission rule cannot automatically displace the institution&#039;s established selection process, though reasonable regulatory measures to maintain standards remain permissible. The institution may also give limited preference to its own community to preserve minority character, but it cannot exclude non-minority candidates or adopt an excessive community-based monopoly, since Articles 29(2) and 30(1) require merit-based, non-discriminatory admission within constitutional limits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (12) TMI 276 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172773</link>
      <description>A minority educational institution retains protection under Article 30(1) where its origin, management, religious character and institutional identity show it was established and administered by a religious minority, even if affiliated to a university. That protection includes substantial autonomy in admissions and administration, so a marks-only admission rule cannot automatically displace the institution&#039;s established selection process, though reasonable regulatory measures to maintain standards remain permissible. The institution may also give limited preference to its own community to preserve minority character, but it cannot exclude non-minority candidates or adopt an excessive community-based monopoly, since Articles 29(2) and 30(1) require merit-based, non-discriminatory admission within constitutional limits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>