https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172774 The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the State Government's appellate power to set aside the Collector's order. It found that the State Government had the authority to review the evidence independently. The Court also ruled that the respondent society substantially complied with Rule 4(2) and properly identified itself, rejecting technical arguments. Additionally, it clarified that the principle of priority did not apply to minor minerals like clay and upheld the State Government's policy to prefer cooperative societies as in line with constitutional principles. The petition was dismissed with costs. en-us Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:50:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172774 The Court dismissed the petition, upholding the State Government's appellate power to set aside the Collector's order. It found that the State Government had the authority to review the evidence independently. The Court also ruled that the respondent society substantially complied with Rule 4(2) and properly identified itself, rejecting technical arguments. Additionally, it clarified that the principle of priority did not apply to minor minerals like clay and upheld the State Government's policy to prefer cooperative societies as in line with constitutional principles. The petition was dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172774