<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172772</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders removing the board of directors and appointing an administrator under Section 78 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. It found the actions to be extreme and abnormal, indicating a mala fide exercise of power influenced by political motives. The court emphasized the importance of consultation with the federal society and the need for reasoned appellate orders. Specific charges against the board were examined, with the court concluding that none warranted action under Section 78. The court directed the restoration of control to the board of directors, denying the respondents&#039; request for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court and for a stay of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:39:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172772</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders removing the board of directors and appointing an administrator under Section 78 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. It found the actions to be extreme and abnormal, indicating a mala fide exercise of power influenced by political motives. The court emphasized the importance of consultation with the federal society and the need for reasoned appellate orders. Specific charges against the board were examined, with the court concluding that none warranted action under Section 78. The court directed the restoration of control to the board of directors, denying the respondents&#039; request for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court and for a stay of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>