<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (8) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172772</link>
    <description>Supersession of an elected co-operative managing committee under Section 78 was invalid where the proposed action rested on charges not properly put to the board, relied on later audit material, or was otherwise too insubstantial to justify the drastic power; the Court also treated irrelevant and extraneous considerations as undermining bona fide statutory satisfaction, so the supersession was quashed. The Section 152 appellate order was unsustainable because it was cryptic, non-speaking, and failed to independently address the appeal grounds, so it was set aside. Consultation with the federal society was noted as requiring meaningful effect, but no final finding was recorded because relief was already granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (8) TMI 234 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172772</link>
      <description>Supersession of an elected co-operative managing committee under Section 78 was invalid where the proposed action rested on charges not properly put to the board, relied on later audit material, or was otherwise too insubstantial to justify the drastic power; the Court also treated irrelevant and extraneous considerations as undermining bona fide statutory satisfaction, so the supersession was quashed. The Section 152 appellate order was unsustainable because it was cryptic, non-speaking, and failed to independently address the appeal grounds, so it was set aside. Consultation with the federal society was noted as requiring meaningful effect, but no final finding was recorded because relief was already granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>