<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (6) TMI 511 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172771</link>
    <description>The Bench set aside the imposition of service tax on the sale of pre-paid SIM cards by the appellants, relying on a previous decision establishing that service tax does not apply to such sales. The Bench also rejected the characterization of the appellants&#039; activities as Business Auxiliary Service, emphasizing their role in the sale of goods rather than the provision of services. Correspondence with the telecom provider confirmed that service tax had already been paid on the SIM cards, leading to the conclusion that no additional tax was owed. As a result, the appeals were allowed based on established legal principles and factual circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2017 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (6) TMI 511 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172771</link>
      <description>The Bench set aside the imposition of service tax on the sale of pre-paid SIM cards by the appellants, relying on a previous decision establishing that service tax does not apply to such sales. The Bench also rejected the characterization of the appellants&#039; activities as Business Auxiliary Service, emphasizing their role in the sale of goods rather than the provision of services. Correspondence with the telecom provider confirmed that service tax had already been paid on the SIM cards, leading to the conclusion that no additional tax was owed. As a result, the appeals were allowed based on established legal principles and factual circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172771</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>