<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 942 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172758</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC upheld the appellant&#039;s guilt under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, sentencing them to six months R.I. with a Rs. 5,000 fine and one year R.I. with a Rs. 5,000 fine concurrently. Considering the appellant&#039;s trial ordeal, fine payment, goods confiscation, and two months&#039; incarceration, the court reduced the sentence to time served. The case concluded, and the petitioner in custody was to be released promptly if not needed in another case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 15:25:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 942 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172758</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC upheld the appellant&#039;s guilt under Sections 132 and 135(1)(a) of the Customs Act, sentencing them to six months R.I. with a Rs. 5,000 fine and one year R.I. with a Rs. 5,000 fine concurrently. Considering the appellant&#039;s trial ordeal, fine payment, goods confiscation, and two months&#039; incarceration, the court reduced the sentence to time served. The case concluded, and the petitioner in custody was to be released promptly if not needed in another case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>