https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172756 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the entitlement to pension under Regulation 8(3) of the Punjab State Public Service Commission (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1958, stating that the regulation cannot be applied retrospectively. Additionally, the Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's ruling on jurisdictional grounds, stating that the appellant's claim under the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly (Allowances & Pension of Members) Act, 1971, fell outside the High Court's jurisdiction. The appellant's request for retrospective application of Regulation 8(3) was also rejected by the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed with directions to seek pension from the State of Himachal Pradesh or file a petition in the Himachal Pradesh High Court for relief. en-us Fri, 13 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 14:30:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172756 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision regarding the entitlement to pension under Regulation 8(3) of the Punjab State Public Service Commission (Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1958, stating that the regulation cannot be applied retrospectively. Additionally, the Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's ruling on jurisdictional grounds, stating that the appellant's claim under the Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly (Allowances & Pension of Members) Act, 1971, fell outside the High Court's jurisdiction. The appellant's request for retrospective application of Regulation 8(3) was also rejected by the Supreme Court. The appeal was dismissed with directions to seek pension from the State of Himachal Pradesh or file a petition in the Himachal Pradesh High Court for relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172756