<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 52 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172739</link>
    <description>Additional evidence in appeal may be admitted when the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment or for other substantial cause, and the power under the Code of Civil Procedure is not defeated merely because reasons are not expressly recorded. The absence of recorded reasons is a serious defect, but it is not automatically fatal where the record shows that the court applied its mind and admitted the evidence to cure an apparent lacuna, especially if the objection was not pressed when the evidence was received. On that basis, the admission of the additional evidence was not vitiated, and the finding founded on it was left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 52 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172739</link>
      <description>Additional evidence in appeal may be admitted when the appellate court requires it to pronounce judgment or for other substantial cause, and the power under the Code of Civil Procedure is not defeated merely because reasons are not expressly recorded. The absence of recorded reasons is a serious defect, but it is not automatically fatal where the record shows that the court applied its mind and admitted the evidence to cure an apparent lacuna, especially if the objection was not pressed when the evidence was received. On that basis, the admission of the additional evidence was not vitiated, and the finding founded on it was left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>