<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (2) TMI 52 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172739</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving disqualification under Article 173(b) of the Constitution due to age, undue influence by state ministers on voters, secrecy of the ballot, and improper deletion of voters&#039; names. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the lower courts&#039; findings of fact and determined that the High Court appropriately exercised its discretion in admitting additional evidence. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:25:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395138" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (2) TMI 52 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172739</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving disqualification under Article 173(b) of the Constitution due to age, undue influence by state ministers on voters, secrecy of the ballot, and improper deletion of voters&#039; names. The Court found no grounds to interfere with the lower courts&#039; findings of fact and determined that the High Court appropriately exercised its discretion in admitting additional evidence. The appeal was dismissed, with costs awarded against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>