<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (11) TMI 887 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172738</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai allowed all 15 appeals concerning the valuation of pipes for a turnkey project under the Central Excise Valuation Rules. The Tribunal held that the Department&#039;s adoption of indicative prices from the tender invitation document was not based on comparable values and could not be approved. As alternative rules were not applicable, the appellants&#039; duty payment method based on the cost calculated as per CAS-4 with 15%/10% added was deemed appropriate. Consequently, all impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, directing authorities to verify the appellants&#039; duty computation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 12:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (11) TMI 887 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172738</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai allowed all 15 appeals concerning the valuation of pipes for a turnkey project under the Central Excise Valuation Rules. The Tribunal held that the Department&#039;s adoption of indicative prices from the tender invitation document was not based on comparable values and could not be approved. As alternative rules were not applicable, the appellants&#039; duty payment method based on the cost calculated as per CAS-4 with 15%/10% added was deemed appropriate. Consequently, all impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed, directing authorities to verify the appellants&#039; duty computation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>