<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 996 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172736</link>
    <description>The court upheld the conviction of the appellant for possession of contraband under the NDPS Act, despite the non-examination of an independent witness, Kaur Singh. The court found reliance on official witnesses permissible in the absence of animosity. Additionally, the mixing of contraband found in two bags before sampling was deemed not prejudicial, given the quantity exceeded commercial limits. The sentence imposed by the Special Judge was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed based on the evidence and NDPS Act provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:24:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 996 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172736</link>
      <description>The court upheld the conviction of the appellant for possession of contraband under the NDPS Act, despite the non-examination of an independent witness, Kaur Singh. The court found reliance on official witnesses permissible in the absence of animosity. Additionally, the mixing of contraband found in two bags before sampling was deemed not prejudicial, given the quantity exceeded commercial limits. The sentence imposed by the Special Judge was upheld, and the appeals were dismissed based on the evidence and NDPS Act provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172736</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>