<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 266 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172734</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the wholesale price for BSC brand shoes is applicable to Bata brand shoes for valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act. The request for additional evidence by the respondents was denied, and the commercial recognition argument was not substantiated with evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the consistency in valuation principles before and after the introduction of the new Section 4.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395131" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 266 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172734</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the wholesale price for BSC brand shoes is applicable to Bata brand shoes for valuation under Section 4 of the Central Excises &amp;amp; Salt Act. The request for additional evidence by the respondents was denied, and the commercial recognition argument was not substantiated with evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the consistency in valuation principles before and after the introduction of the new Section 4.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>