https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172733 A defence to a suit for redemption failed where the alleged agreement said to transfer the mortgagors' interest was not proved genuine on the evidence and surrounding circumstances, so the mortgagors' transferees retained the right to redeem. The commentary also states that additional evidence on appeal may be admitted only when the appellate court itself requires it for judgment or some substantial cause, and not to fill gaps in a party's case after an adequate trial opportunity. On that basis, fresh evidence should not have been received, and the decree restoring redemption was upheld in principle. en-us Thu, 26 Mar 1931 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Aug 2015 12:16:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172733 A defence to a suit for redemption failed where the alleged agreement said to transfer the mortgagors' interest was not proved genuine on the evidence and surrounding circumstances, so the mortgagors' transferees retained the right to redeem. The commentary also states that additional evidence on appeal may be admitted only when the appellate court itself requires it for judgment or some substantial cause, and not to fill gaps in a party's case after an adequate trial opportunity. On that basis, fresh evidence should not have been received, and the decree restoring redemption was upheld in principle. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Mar 1931 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172733