<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 696 - CESTAT CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172722</link>
    <description>MODVAT credit on duty-paid HDPE granules could not be denied merely because the granules were not the exact grade recommended for DOT-specification pipes, where the record did not show non-receipt, sale as such, or non-use in manufacture. The technical material, including manufacturers&#039; letters and CIPET opinion, supported that pipes meeting the specification could be produced by blending different grades of virgin HDPE raw material. The demand was also time-barred because the assessee had disclosed the transactions in statutory records and returns, so suppression was not established. Penalties and interest founded on the demand could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 10:59:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 696 - CESTAT CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172722</link>
      <description>MODVAT credit on duty-paid HDPE granules could not be denied merely because the granules were not the exact grade recommended for DOT-specification pipes, where the record did not show non-receipt, sale as such, or non-use in manufacture. The technical material, including manufacturers&#039; letters and CIPET opinion, supported that pipes meeting the specification could be produced by blending different grades of virgin HDPE raw material. The demand was also time-barred because the assessee had disclosed the transactions in statutory records and returns, so suppression was not established. Penalties and interest founded on the demand could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=172722</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>