<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1131 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263214</link>
    <description>Reassessment is permissible where the original assessment contains no conclusive finding on rebate or exemption and the assessing authority forms a bona fide belief on relevant material that such relief may have been wrongly allowed. The absence of any recorded determination on entitlement to rebate left the issue open, and the same material could support reopening where the statutory conditions for rebate were not clearly satisfied, including the restriction where goods are not sold or resold in the same form in inter-State trade, commerce, or export. The reopening challenge therefore failed, while the assessee remained free to place material before the authority on the factual entitlement to rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:55:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1131 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263214</link>
      <description>Reassessment is permissible where the original assessment contains no conclusive finding on rebate or exemption and the assessing authority forms a bona fide belief on relevant material that such relief may have been wrongly allowed. The absence of any recorded determination on entitlement to rebate left the issue open, and the same material could support reopening where the statutory conditions for rebate were not clearly satisfied, including the restriction where goods are not sold or resold in the same form in inter-State trade, commerce, or export. The reopening challenge therefore failed, while the assessee remained free to place material before the authority on the factual entitlement to rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>