<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 2 - CEGAT (NEW DELHI)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT (New Delhi) dismissed appeals related to refund applications for service tax payments, ruling that the appeals were not maintainable due to retrospective validation under Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. The Tribunal upheld the decision based on a previous ruling involving Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=39508" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 2 - CEGAT (NEW DELHI)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT (New Delhi) dismissed appeals related to refund applications for service tax payments, ruling that the appeals were not maintainable due to retrospective validation under Section 117 of the Finance Act, 2000. The Tribunal upheld the decision based on a previous ruling involving Section 112 of the Finance Act, 2000. The appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>