<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1123 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263206</link>
    <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal on merits because the amount involved was very meagre, and it dismissed the appeal while expressly leaving the question of law open. The order does not decide the substantive legal issue and records no determination on the underlying excise dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:54:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1123 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263206</link>
      <description>In a Central Excise matter, the Supreme Court declined to entertain the appeal on merits because the amount involved was very meagre, and it dismissed the appeal while expressly leaving the question of law open. The order does not decide the substantive legal issue and records no determination on the underlying excise dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>