<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1122 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263205</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and, after reviewing the record, found the central excise appeals to be devoid of merit. The appeals were therefore dismissed. The order records hearing of the appellant&#039;s counsel and reflects only the Court&#039;s conclusion that no arguable basis for interference was shown on the materials before it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 07:54:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1122 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263205</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court condoned the delay and, after reviewing the record, found the central excise appeals to be devoid of merit. The appeals were therefore dismissed. The order records hearing of the appellant&#039;s counsel and reflects only the Court&#039;s conclusion that no arguable basis for interference was shown on the materials before it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263205</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>