https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263194 The Court held that once the rejoinder was taken on record and both sides led evidence on that basis, the factual material in the rejoinder could not be excluded without legal justification, and it remained relevant to the merits. On the transfer dispute, the Court found the transfer documents surrounded by suspicious circumstances and treated the matter as one arising in a fiduciary setting, requiring the beneficiary to prove genuineness and fairness; that burden was not discharged. It also held that estoppel failed because no clear representation, reliance, and detriment were proved. The transfer was therefore unsustainable and the award in favour of the transferor was restored. en-us Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Jul 2016 17:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263194 The Court held that once the rejoinder was taken on record and both sides led evidence on that basis, the factual material in the rejoinder could not be excluded without legal justification, and it remained relevant to the merits. On the transfer dispute, the Court found the transfer documents surrounded by suspicious circumstances and treated the matter as one arising in a fiduciary setting, requiring the beneficiary to prove genuineness and fairness; that burden was not discharged. It also held that estoppel failed because no clear representation, reliance, and detriment were proved. The transfer was therefore unsustainable and the award in favour of the transferor was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263194