<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (8) TMI 1109 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263192</link>
    <description>A cooperative bank&#039;s elected board could not be superseded unless the governing statute&#039;s requirement of previous consultation with the Reserve Bank of India was satisfied. The consultation had to be real and effective, with the relevant materials, the board&#039;s reply, and the proposed action placed before the Reserve Bank so it could form an independent view; mere forwarding of a show-cause notice was insufficient. On the facts, that mandatory condition was not met, and the grounds relied on were found too general to justify supersession. The availability of an alternative statutory appeal did not bar writ relief where the action was unlawful and contrary to a mandatory statutory safeguard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=395064" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (8) TMI 1109 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263192</link>
      <description>A cooperative bank&#039;s elected board could not be superseded unless the governing statute&#039;s requirement of previous consultation with the Reserve Bank of India was satisfied. The consultation had to be real and effective, with the relevant materials, the board&#039;s reply, and the proposed action placed before the Reserve Bank so it could form an independent view; mere forwarding of a show-cause notice was insufficient. On the facts, that mandatory condition was not met, and the grounds relied on were found too general to justify supersession. The availability of an alternative statutory appeal did not bar writ relief where the action was unlawful and contrary to a mandatory statutory safeguard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>