https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263189 Where a special statute prescribes its own limitation period but does not expressly exclude the Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 applies through Section 29(2). On that basis, revisions filed under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 can seek condonation of delay. The earlier view treating such revisions as automatically time-barred was found unsustainable because it overlooked the absence of an exclusionary clause and the general applicability of Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act. The delay was therefore liable to be condoned, and the matter proceeded for consideration on merits. en-us Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263189 Where a special statute prescribes its own limitation period but does not expressly exclude the Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 applies through Section 29(2). On that basis, revisions filed under Section 19 of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983 can seek condonation of delay. The earlier view treating such revisions as automatically time-barred was found unsustainable because it overlooked the absence of an exclusionary clause and the general applicability of Sections 4 to 24 of the Limitation Act. The delay was therefore liable to be condoned, and the matter proceeded for consideration on merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263189