https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263187 The Court held that the Tribunal's grant of an unlimited stay period was erroneous as it contravened Section 35-C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that interim orders cannot exceed 365 days and directed the Tribunal to decide appeals within six months from the order date. Emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions, the Court outlined that upon expiration, the assessee could seek a fresh stay application for consideration, ensuring timely resolution of appeals. en-us Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263187 The Court held that the Tribunal's grant of an unlimited stay period was erroneous as it contravened Section 35-C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It clarified that interim orders cannot exceed 365 days and directed the Tribunal to decide appeals within six months from the order date. Emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions, the Court outlined that upon expiration, the assessee could seek a fresh stay application for consideration, ensuring timely resolution of appeals. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 02 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=263187